My Accout | Mobile App
Translate »
    Chinese(Simplified)EnglishIndonesianThaiVietnamese
    Chinese(Simplified)EnglishIndonesianThaiVietnamese
Powered by Translate

Article

Myelogenousleukemia, chronic

Numerous individuals who are diagnosed with CLL are reprimanded to hang on any treatment, as the disease frequently progresses slowly, and any change with treatment is not lasting. Worse yet, the course and aggressiveness of the disease can change whenever. Patients are advised to “watch and hold up.” This is not a cheerful approach to live.

 

Causes

 

No good examples. The sad truth is that, until this past January 2009, I could discover no reference (not one) of any person who was cured of CLL through any sort of customary medical – or elective – therapy. The main special case are those who have been cured by method for a bone marrow transplant (BMT). Sadly, numerous individuals don’t survive the system. It is to a great degree risky. Worse yet, a patient can survive the BMT and still have CLL, or create CLL again at a later date.

 

Symptoms

 

The five-year course of events. Despite all the research and trials, there is still no ordinarily sanctioned therapy (chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy, and so forth.), short of BMT, that can impact a cure. Doctors give patients the desire for a complete remission of five years with some of the accessible therapies. Not all patients accomplish complete remission in the first round of chemotherapy. Furthermore, the shot of success, measured by five-year survival, decreases with each new type of routine therapy. Not an empowering picture. This situation has been obvious to me since 2001, when I was forty-six and first diagnosed. Who wants to catch wind of a five-year life arrangement when you’re forty-six? Not me! While there have been some promising ordinary “breakthroughs,” the survival rate remains practically the same today.

 

Diagnosis

 

As a person diagnosed with CLL (perpetual lymphocytic leukemia) since 2001, I’ve had my eyes prepared on Google Alerts and on the web as a rule, consistently searching for breakthroughs, both ordinarily and in the option prescription stadium. Numerous individuals who are diagnosed with CLL are berated to hang on any treatment, as the disease frequently progresses slowly, and any change with treatment is not lasting. Worse yet, the course and aggressiveness of the disease can change whenever. Patients are advised to “watch and hold up.” This is not a glad approach to live.

 

Treatment

 

No good examples. The sad truth is that, until this past January 2009, I could discover no reference (not one) of any person who was cured of CLL through any sort of customary medical – or elective – therapy. The main special case are those who have been cured by method for a bone marrow transplant (BMT). Sadly, numerous individuals don’t survive the methodology. It is to a great degree risky. Worse yet, a patient can survive the BMT and still have CLL, or create CLL again at a later date.

 

The five-year course of events. Despite all the research and trials, there is still no expectedly sanctioned therapy (chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy, and so forth.), short of BMT, that can impact a cure. Doctors give patients the expectation for a complete remission of five years with some of the accessible therapies. Not all patients accomplish complete remission in the first round of chemotherapy. What’s more, the shot of success, measured by five-year survival, decreases with each new type of routine therapy. Not an empowering picture. This situation has been apparent to me since 2001, when I was forty-six and first diagnosed. Who wants to find out about a five-year life arrangement when you’re forty-six? Not me! While there have been some promising customary “breakthroughs,” the survival rate remains essentially the same today.

0 Comments